Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
54,487 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 48,957 (89.9%) 
Undecided
  
 3,047 (5.6%) 
Declined
  
 2,483 (4.6%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nirmal Dulal (talk) on 2024-03-17 12:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Oriolus xanthornus (Black-hooded oriole) - in flight

please crop... Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:37, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Thank you. -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 13:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-03-18 22:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Fantasia (ship, 1951), bow view.
  •  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Sorry to be slow with this response but have been looking at this image for a couple or days and regretfully oppose. Getting up high on a bridge or ridge provides a good view but the image is cluttered with other boats around it. This is the stern view, not the bow. Per the source web site, build year may be 1952. Categorization is not in keeping with Category:Ships.
At one time, this ship was a commercial inland barge but it appears to have been converted to a private home-on-the-water. Per COM:VIV, while this image may be unique, this houseboat does not have sufficient value to be considered for VI. --GRDN711 (talk) 01:57, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment @GRDN711: Thanks for your advice It seems that this ship was originally attached to Citerne P14609 in port Strasbourg, the most likely date could be 1951. It was converted to a private home-on-the-water in Wambrechies.
✓ Done correction stern view. I blurred the background to reduce the clutter of other boats nearby. Best regards.--Pierre André (talk) 10:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Трифонов Андрей (talk) on 2024-03-20 15:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Dachne, Sudak Municipality
Reason:
This photo allows you to create an impression of the village as a whole, inscribed in the natural landscape. The Taraktash rock ridge is clearly visible. Used in 11 wikiprojects -- Трифонов Андрей (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2024-03-20 17:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Drinking fountains in Florence
Reason:
This drinking foutain, located in Florence next to the Palazzo Vecchi, Piazza della Signoria (about 40 metres from Michealangelo's statue of David) has the city's emblem (a red fleur-de-lis) emblazoned on it. -- Martinvl (talk)
The first sentence of the article it:Giglio_(araldica) is "Il giglio (conosciuto anche col suo nome francese fleur-de-lys, anche trascritto come fleur-de-lis...)" which translates to "The lily (also known by its French name fleur-de-lys, also transcribed as fleur-de-lis...)". There is no mention of an iris in that text.
Martinvl (talk) 21:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2024-03-21 15:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside cross (1632) in Trier-Ruwer, Germany.

 Best in Scope--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC)  Best in Scope --Трифонов Андрей (talk) 08:17, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-03-21 18:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Stations of the Cross in the Kapelle St. Johannes Baptista (Vulpera) Jesus is placed in the tomb.
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-22 05:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Angerona prunaria specimens – female dorsal

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 06:29, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-22 06:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Sigismondo Malatesta medal with Castel Sismondo ("Son of Pandulfus" version) by Matteo de' Pasti
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-03-22 06:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Hemicycla distensa, shell, unicoloured form
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-03-22 09:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Church of the Intercession in the village Letychivka, Ukraine
✓ Done --Nikride (talk) 07:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 20:23, 22 March 2024 (UTC) on 2024-03-22 20:23 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
Theophrastus redivivus - First page
Used in:
en:Theophrastus redivivus
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 20:27, 22 March 2024 (UTC) on 2024-03-22 20:27 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
The System of Nature by Mirabaud (= Baron d'Holbach) - Cover page
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 20:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC) on 2024-03-22 20:30 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
Denis Diderot - Louis-Michel van Loo - Louvre RF 1958 – 1767 painting
Used in:
en:Denis Diderot, en:Rococo
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 20:38, 22 March 2024 (UTC) on 2024-03-22 20:38 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
Portrait of man with bust of Denis Diderot – painting by Jean-Simon Berthélemy
Added (Jean-Simon Berthélemy). --Thi (talk) 22:03, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 20:41, 22 March 2024 (UTC) on 2024-03-22 20:41 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
Portrait of Jeremy Bentham (Pickersgill)

 Best in Scope, useful and used --LexKurochkin (talk) 13:38, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-23 05:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Crucifixion and Saints - Venetian-Byzantine painter (mid-14th century) - Museo Correr
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-23 05:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Angerona prunaria – female ventral

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:15, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-03-23 06:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Decatopecten radula (Radula Scallop), right valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nirmal Dulal (talk) on 2024-03-23 06:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Alcippe nipalensis (Nepal Fulvetta)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nirmal Dulal (talk) on 2024-03-23 06:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Emberiza aureola (Yellow-breasted Bunting) - in flight
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-03-23 18:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Conjunto escultórico do Parque do Dique do Tororó, view from Av. Vasco da Gama
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 18:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC) on 2024-03-23 18:21 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
Cheerful Democritus (Charles-Antoine Coypel, 1746) – painting
Used in:
en:Democritus
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 18:38, 23 March 2024 (UTC) on 2024-03-23 18:38 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
Bertrand Russell (photo by Bassano, 1936)
Used in:
de:Bertrand Russell, es:Bertrand Russell
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 18:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC) on 2024-03-23 18:48 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London
Used in:
en:Bertrand Russell, de, es
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 19:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC) on 2024-03-23 19:03 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
Shiva Honey
Used in:
en:Shiva Honey – member of The Satanic Temple
Reason:
Portrait of priestess and author Shiva Honey. The photo has artificial scratches for artistic reasons (vintage look). Similar to this, but this one is more useful as a portrait in encyclopedia. -- --Thi (talk) 19:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-24 06:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Fragment of a funerary stele inv.292 - Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice)

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:47, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-24 06:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Angerona prunaria corylaria – mounted specimen female dorsal

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-03-24 06:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Decatopecten radula (Radula Scallop), left valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2024-03-24 09:36 (UTC)
Scope:
River Syre between Mertert and Manternach, Luxembourg.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2024-03-24 09:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside cross in Manternach, Syrdallstrooss 29, Luxembourg.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-03-24 11:38 (UTC)
Scope:
BMW U10 - left rear view
Used in:
de:BMW U10
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-03-24 11:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Opel Insignia B Sports Tourer GSi - left rear view
Used in:
de:Opel Insignia B
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2024-03-24 16:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Electoral building (1730) in Freudenburg, Germany.

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 20:21, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-03-24 20:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Audi RS3 8Y - right rear view
Used in:
de:Audi RS3, de:Audi A3 8Y, en:Audi A3
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
GRDN711 (talk) on 2024-03-25 01:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Haines, Alaska USA – harbor and town view
Used in:
https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Haines
Reason:
A front-facing view that clearly shows the harbor, docks and dramatic background scenery of Haines, Alaska USA. -- GRDN711 (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-25 06:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Frizzoni Madonna by Giovanni Bellini (Museo Correr) in Venice
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-25 06:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Papyrus Varille, Musée Georges Labit, Toulouse
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-25 06:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Ancient Roman statues in the Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice) - Nereid on dolphin
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-03-25 06:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Cerithium alutaceum, shell
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
MB-one (talk) on 2024-03-25 10:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Generali-Gebäude (Linz) at night

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 18:42, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-03-25 11:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Telizhyntsi

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 18:42, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2024-03-25 12:46 (UTC)
Scope:
World War I and II memorial in Mackenheim
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
GRDN711 (talk) on 2024-03-25 15:50 (UTC)
Scope:
RORO ferry, Husøy - IMO 7041431
Reason:
Best view of this ship by name. -- GRDN711 (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-03-25 16:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Decoration on the vaults of the Reformierte Kirche Zernez (interior)
Used in:
Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland.
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-03-25 20:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Volkswagen Tiguan III - right front view
Used in:
de:Volkswagen, de:VW Tiguan, de:VW Tiguan III, en:Volkswagen Tiguan, pl:Volkswagen Tiguan
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-03-25 20:31 (UTC)
Scope:
BMW iX M60 - right rear view
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-03-25 20:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Volkswagen T-Cross (2023) - left front view
Used in:
de:VW T-Cross
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
grendel|khan on 2024-03-25 20:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Plastic bottle recycling, closeup of bale
Used in:
en:Plastic recycling
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
grendel|khan on 2024-03-25 20:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Koyaike park, aerial view
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-26 05:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Oil lamp in the shape of a Dragon, late 16th-century - Museo Correr
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-26 05:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Female nude (Susanna) by Lino Selvatico - 1909
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-03-26 06:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Sant'Antonio da Padova by Alvise Vivarini - Correr Museum
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Contributers2020Talk to me here! on 2024-03-26 08:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Public infrastructure in the district of Satara, Maharashtra
Reason:
This picture seems to be the sole picture under the scope. The picture has quite a decent quality. -- Contributers2020Talk to me here!
Archaeodontosaurus, thank you for your valuable comment. Suggested alteration is ✓ done. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 10:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
grendel|khan on 2024-03-26 17:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Mount Wachusett
Used in:
en:Mount Wachusett, en:Worcester County, Massachusetts, en:Midstate Trail (Massachusetts), de:Mount Wachusett, fr:Comté de Worcester (Massachusetts), and so on
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-03-26 18:40 (UTC)
Scope:
BMW U10 - left front view
Used in:
de:BMW U10, pl:BMW X2, ru:BMW U10
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-03-26 18:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Toyota Tacoma (N300) - left front view
Used in:
de:Toyota
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-03-26 18:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Volkswagen T-Cross (2023) - left rear view
Used in:
de:VW T-Cross
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
DEGA MD (talk) on 2024-03-26 19:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Storage jar with Herakles carrying the Erymanthean boar by Leagros Group in the Getty Villa
Reason:
Studio quality image of an ancient Greek vessel created by Leagros Group. -- DEGA MD (talk)
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

Portrait of Vicente Guerrero[edit]

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) on 2021-01-21 17:47 (UTC)
Scope:

Retrato Vicente Guerrero por Anacleto Escutia en Palacio Nacional (Mexico)

(Portrait of Vicente Guerrero by Anacleto Escutia in Palacio Nacional (Mexico))

Previous reviews

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:17, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
ErickTErick (talk) on 2023-10-31 21:45 (UTC)
Scope:

Retrato póstumo del presidente Vicente Guerrero en el Museo Nacional de Historia, Ciudad de México

(Posthumous portrait of President Vicente Guerrero in the National Museum of History, Mexico City)
Reason:
The version of this image which currently considered the most valuable within its scope is of much lower quality than this newer version. In addition, the name given to the scope is factually wrong about the location of the painting (it is not within Palacio Nacional) and Mexico's Spanish name is misspelled (it's México, not Mexico). -- ErickTErick (talk)
✓ Done Started MVR ErickTErick (talk) 19:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:17, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach[edit]

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ezarateesteban on 2023-11-26 22:02 (UTC)
Scope:
El Aficionado by Antonio Casanova y Estorach

 Comment The original file is the .tiff : File:El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach.tiff. Everypeople can create a better processed image from this file. So what are we suposed to do ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am doing it according this reccomendation Ezarateesteban 23:13, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:17, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ezarateesteban on 2023-11-26 22:00 (UTC)
Scope:
El Aficionado by Antonio Casanova y Estorach

 Comment The original file is the .tiff : File:El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach.tiff. Everypeople can create a better processed image from this file. So what are we suposed to do ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:37, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:17, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Anciens bains municipaux de Colmar[edit]

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 [discuter] on 2018-01-22 12:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Exterior of anciens bains municipaux (Colmar)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:18, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:17, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2023-12-29 07:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Exterior of anciens bains municipaux (Colmar)

 Comment The light on the cble is a bit distracting. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:17, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=751225986"